Is it now time to say “Should we learn How to think”
Is it now time to say “Should we learn How to think”? Learn to think entails learning to control what and how we think. Is it okay to spend our entire lives tolerating our natural default methods of thinking rather than choosing to seem distinguished at life? The only absolute truth is that we get to decide how we’re going to try to perceive life and how we construct significance from experience. In David Wallace’s book, “this is water”, Wallace establishes a concept stating that the meaning we construct out of life is conscious decision. It’s a matter of intentional and personal choice. As stated by Time magazine, David Foster Wallace is one of the best novels. He is also one of the most innovative and influential writers in the last twenty years. Wallace’s essay doesn’t sound cheerful or inspiring the way a commencement speech is made-up to sound, later it will become grandly inspirational to graduating class of Kenyon College because what he is telling them is truth , with a lot of rhetorical particulars stripped away. Throughout his essay, Wallace makes use of multiple persuasive methods by constructing common field with the audience, using parallelism, and telling parables.
In the beginning of the book, he tells a story about two young fish who apparently do not know what water is. The parable proves that commonly the most noticeable certainties and facts in the real world are the hardest to perceive. Rather than seeing what ‘s going outside the mind , human instincts cause an imprisonment by forcing us pay more attention to the internal discussion of the mind. People are so self-centered that they become dogmatized and can only gain an incomplete meaning from experiences which habitually makes them troubled and anguished. Though, Wallace designates that if people exercise discipline, awareness, and are sympathetic to other people then they can be unconstrained from this imprisonment. Through the use of ethos, David Foster Wallace establishes credibility by making clear his goal is not to oversee or preach the reader. He does not appear like an opposing dictatorial figure, he undermines his authority to avoid alienating from readers by putting himself at a lower level and designating his flaws in order to be seen as human as the rest of the graduating college students. . For instance; he states “a huge percentage of stuff I tend to be certain of turns out to be deluded and wrong.” The absence of perfectionism provided in Wallace’s essay reveals his humility, which displays to the reader Wallace’s intention is not be someone who’s not . The author builds a strong relevant connection with the reader by uttering himself as flawed and has to settle his own thinking.
Wallace also portrays multiple hypothetical parables serving the purpose to demonstrate the problematic with blind certainty. People are totally convinced, arrogant about their opinions, tightly attached to their beliefs that they do not realize they can be questioned. Our natural default is not to accept the other person’s side. Wallace strengthens this idea to the reader with logical reasoning. He continues to clarify his line of reasoning by telling more and more hypothetical situations. Logos are used by Wallace to build upon his argument by using logical approaches to show the readers, they have choice of how to look at the world differently and freely. Throughout his essay, Wallace proves we are free to choose how to behave and think; we must be reasonable while dealing with others as an alternative of seeing them as in our way. The use of truths is quite noticeable in Wallace’s essay, his statements are valuable in terms of significance and validity, as people we tend to center our way of seeing the world on someone, money or material goods but each individual decides how to see the world. From his perspective we have to see the world as a choice and we have to do the same. Despite that the use of reason and logic are not used much, Wallace offers enough logic and reasonable approaches of how to live. If we cannot make conscious choice about how to think and what to focus on then we will become irritated and morose.
Wallace exploits repetition and parallelism throughout his essay especially the word worship. The author’s repetition of “worship” and the parallelism of his sentences emulate the daily routine we live. Wallace enlarges that people don’t have to deduce situations from the natural instinctive sight that many people tend to do. Wallace promotes the emotional appeal by providing the reader with an alternative viewpoint. Throughout the essay, Wallace reiterated his words and ideas with various parallels. Wallace essay can be considered as a unique critique of the American culture that is a denying lecture about the personal compulsion to encounter the shared social forces that are abolishing our bodies, lives, and minds.